<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for eCommerce Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecommercereport.com.au/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecommercereport.com.au</link>
	<description>Australia&#039;s online business newsletter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:46:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The End of Facebook Commerce? by Ben Kross</title>
		<link>http://www.ecommercereport.com.au/the-end-of-facebook-commerce/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecommercereport.com.au/?p=2402#comment-266</guid>
		<description>The comments by those in the article are in line with my expectations of where we are at, in the mix regarding social commerce.

eCommerceReport published two of my articles regarding using FaceBook in business just over two years ago. Many things have changed but a few things remain unchanged.

My main take away point two years ago remains: &quot;treat social media AS social&quot;.

This quote by Charles Nicholls of Seewhy.com from this article concurs: &quot;..consumers go there to hang out, not shop.&quot;

Certainly, people do end up shopping on FaceBook (incidental transaction caused by recommendation or adv) but perhaps currently, only a smaller subset might specifically go there just to shop or end up shopping in a FaceBook app/page/store. People do, for obvious example, go to eBay to shop because it began blatantly as an auction site which people loved for that specific function. Anything built &quot;off it&quot; later still resonates back to its roots. Similarly, it may be said of FaceBook for the foreseeable future. Anything built &quot;off it&quot; like eCommerce still must resonate especially well with its root audience.

There are many things to balance. 

Thank you for posting this. 
Good food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments by those in the article are in line with my expectations of where we are at, in the mix regarding social commerce.</p>
<p>eCommerceReport published two of my articles regarding using FaceBook in business just over two years ago. Many things have changed but a few things remain unchanged.</p>
<p>My main take away point two years ago remains: &#8220;treat social media AS social&#8221;.</p>
<p>This quote by Charles Nicholls of Seewhy.com from this article concurs: &#8220;..consumers go there to hang out, not shop.&#8221;</p>
<p>Certainly, people do end up shopping on FaceBook (incidental transaction caused by recommendation or adv) but perhaps currently, only a smaller subset might specifically go there just to shop or end up shopping in a FaceBook app/page/store. People do, for obvious example, go to eBay to shop because it began blatantly as an auction site which people loved for that specific function. Anything built &#8220;off it&#8221; later still resonates back to its roots. Similarly, it may be said of FaceBook for the foreseeable future. Anything built &#8220;off it&#8221; like eCommerce still must resonate especially well with its root audience.</p>
<p>There are many things to balance. </p>
<p>Thank you for posting this.<br />
Good food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on auDA relaxes rules on trading in Australian domain names. by disgusted</title>
		<link>http://www.ecommercereport.com.au/auda-relaxes-rules-on-trading-in-australian-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>disgusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 03:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecommercereport.com.au/?p=1865#comment-262</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m disgusted that a site marketing themselves as &quot;Australia&#039;s online business newsletter&quot; would use Americanised words such as &quot;standardized&quot; and &quot;monetization&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m disgusted that a site marketing themselves as &#8220;Australia&#8217;s online business newsletter&#8221; would use Americanised words such as &#8220;standardized&#8221; and &#8220;monetization&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

